Personally I applaud Mr Cawthon for making a fun and engaging game, and responding to community input to release more and more content with reasonable pricing. He’s making a living doing what he enjoys. When it comes time for him to develop a game outside of the series, he’ll be able to afford to, and have the name recognition to get it played. He’s making people happy and doing well for himself, I don’t see why anyone should be angry about that.
1 Like
because people are jealous?
Maybe cause some of my friends are jealous of FNAF??
Must be a new slenderman game?
#NOPE
Maybe because they are bad games?
2 Likes
“We"ll stop beating this dead horse when it stops spitting out money” - Bo Burnham
Maybe i’ll like FNAF if it didn’t become a money-hungry franchise, and just that random game i find someone playing on a video games forum that i decided to buy and then thought “this is pretty good.”
and then i’ll share it to my friends
then finally some youtubers start playing it
and pewdiepie
and markiplier
and everyone and their unborn babies play it too
2 Likes
disagreed. I shall not rant until you want me to.
Well, i haven’t actually played the game enough to say something about it, but i think the concept is decent. The only thing that ruined the game was the fanbase.
1 Like
Can agree. The worst part of the fanbase is the youtube comment. I dare anyone say FNaF Sucks on a FNaF video. You’ll be bombard by immature people. Or check Scott comments on Youtube and view all replies.
2 Likes
In that case, please tell me why Five Nights at Freddy’s would deserve a ‘‘overwhelmingly positive’’ rating on Steam over games like Mass Effect, Just Cause 2 and even great indie titles like The Escapists and Guacamelee. Oh right, it doesn’t. That’s a fact.
1 Like
Ah, that’s my point: The fanbase is sucking Scott’s thumb at this point. They praise the game like it’s holy and should go to gaming heaven- but it doesn’t. It’s half decent, at best.
1 Like
Yup. It should actually have mixed reviews at best.
I guess. I just didn’t want anything to get out of hand. Be sure to keep an eye on this one. 
The first one was okay. It introduced a new play-style to the horror genre and also had a great atmosphere. It was all downhill from there.
I just hope that Scott will be able to move on from this series and show his hand in other games.
He’s giving the people what they want and he’s making a living off it. What would you do in that situation? Not that FNAF is a good series, just sayin.
Well I would not pump them out every 3 months and at least try to put effort in my sequels and try to improve upon them. He’s just releasing the same game over and over with minor tweaks. At least try to make something you can be proud of.
1 Like
What changes (besides ending the series) would you like him to make? The main reason why the game seems like a re-skin is because the FNAF crowd enjoy the core gameplay. Not much you can change unless you change that.
I’m not into FNAF enough to judge what changes he should make, but there should be major changes made with every new entry in a franchise. New features or whatever. You can always build more about the core gameplay instead of just using that core gameplay every time.
xD same here 
First of all, you’re heavily criticizing a (soon-to-be) series that you’ve never really gotten into? The lack of experience does not warrant this amount of annoyance. Secondly, could name me a couple of your favorite games and/or series?
Just so we’re clear, for future reference, I do not think these games are anything above mediocre. The story is somewhat interesting, but that’s about it. The sole-purpose of my curiosity originates from a couple of people’s (including you) strong criticism towards these games (which you ‘haven’t really gotten into’). I am merely wondering where this annoyance or hatred for the series comes from.
It really is quite confusing… If you don’t like the games or the fans, ignore them.
Obviously you’re into it enough to judge just about everything else…