I checked the translation repository and noticed that we have a very few commits per time.
This notes that we either have few moderators, or most likely inactive moderators.
I understand that we have strict screening methods on choosing a translation moderator. Yet I observed this method as slow and loses interest of excited contributors
Thinking of improving the process. How about a little bit of compromise? Hasten the moderator selection, promote a contributor as early as possible while they’re still excited. Promote early, review for demotion later when contribution noise increase, check for translation performance, per community suggestion threshold.
PROS:
- More moderators! More translations!
- A very active translation project attracts more contributors
- Having more contributors results to having more eyes on suggesting a re-translation of already translated data.
- Lessen chances of contributors losing interest because their suggestions were not reviewed/approved/commented, or simply left unattended for a long period of time.
CONS:
- Conflict of acceptance level. Mod1 wants it his way, Mod2 wants it other way. We may resolve this through community feedback.
- Security, moderator just wants to mess everything up. We do still need to have initial screening but lesser strictness. Evict user.
- It’ll be sad for the moderator if he got demoted. Or even MAD! We may need them to proceed some terms-of-agreement that states possible demotion, etc…
Any other ideas? I think I forgot some details. So maybe that’s it so far.
Implement fast, stabilize as we go.
[may need to change forum topic as “translation suggestions”]
Thanks!