Rome Total War:II VS Dying Light

gaming
#1

Hey guys, I know it’s not Chirstmas (anymore :frowning: ) but I didn’t get anything decent (socks that don’t fit me, toothbrush and toothpaste, deck of playing cards picked up at K-Mart), so I’m going to get myself Dying Lite.

Or RomeTW2.

Here are the specs:

ROME TOTEL WER II

Minimum:
    OS: XP/ Vista / Windows 7 / Windows 8
    Processor:2 GHz Intel Dual Core processor / 2.6 GHz Intel Single Core processor
    Memory: 2GB RAM
    Graphics:512 MB DirectX 9.0c compatible card (shader model 3, vertex texture fetch support).
    DirectX®:9.0c
    Hard Drive: 35 GB HD space
    Screen Resolution: 1024x768

8.8/10 -IGN (obviously)
4/5 Metacritic
$50 Normal, $60 Emperor’s Edition

DYING LIGHT

Minimum requirements:

OS: Windows 7 64-bit / Windows 8 64-bit / Windows 8.1 64-bit.
Processor: Intel Core i5-2500 @3.3 GHz / AMD FX-8320 @3.5 GHz.
Memory: 4 GB RAM DDR3.
Hard Drive: 40 GB available space.
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 / AMD Radeon HD 6870 (1GB VRAM)
Direct X: Version 11.
Sound: DirectX compatible.
Any Linux distro 3.14

9/10·Steam
7/10·GameSpot
8.5/10·IGN.com
4/5·Metacritic
$80

Which do you think I should get?

#####I’m leaning slightly towards RTW2.

#2

Fix your Dying Light system specs and add “Any Linux distro 3.14” :slight_smile:

#3

IT IS DYING LIGHT! okay?

#4

That’s what I wrote

#5

Meh.

#6

Dying Light better.

#7

get rome total war ONE its much better than 2
but very old but much cheaper maybe u could get 2 games then it like €3 on steam i think

#8

I don’t think its the best move ever to lie about system specifications :wink:

#9

really? why? why would you do that?

um, thanks?

#10

…
####…
###…
##…
#…

#11

How did you know.

1 Like
#12

No seriously, I don’t see why you lie about it :stuck_out_tongue: Whats the problem?

1 Like
#13

I got it from

#BING

gasp
I’m too lazy to get to go get it from somewhere else.

1 Like