Oh, I’m sorry for testing. I should really stop. I know it’s a command on Windows, but I like to actually test my applications 
but there is syntax…?
What? Yes, there is syntax. What does that have to do with anything? I want to know that the command works, what’s syntax got to do with that?
Nah, it’s just the Unix terminal Microsoftiated.
well, someone literate should know that mkdir makes folders
It does compile at the moment, if you want to play with it.
cmake .
make
./beam
Needs Qt 5 Widgets and Qt 5 Core installed. Only compiles with C++11, and not tested with MSCVP, only the GCC toolchain.
so
can I make mods?
Define “mods”.
modifications
this requires coding?
What did/do you use to code? At the moment I use Atom, but I would like to view the code the same way you did.
Don’t you need the redistribution packs and stuff or something. Correct me if I’m wrong.
Please, choose an option until you continue:
[Mods as in 'Moderators]
[Mods as in ‘Modifiations’]
Vim.
I meant modifications. What else?
For the love of God… Define “modification”. “Mods” is the exact same as “modifications”, so what did you think I meant?
People use “‘Mods’” to refer to not only modifications but also moderators. Easy mistake, especially on a forum.
IF YOU CAN MAKE MODIFICATIONS TO GDT
why is it so hard
and WHY WOULD I BE REFERRING TO MODERATORS ON A MOD MAKER THREAD?
Stop using caps lock.
My point is, if you define a mod as a package.json, then yes. If you don’t, then no. Please keep a bit of a nice attitude instead of using caps on almost an entire post.
I meant the opposite
let me recap my question
but more professional 
Can we make a modification to GDT using this version Beam Mod Maker, in any shape or form?