Ai just dun get what do You mean “freedom” in games
that’s the subject of the third Q/A
-_- You make no sense
pu tuhS
1 Like
it does not mean anything, what you say, or else you poorly explained
How I did not saw this.
Wellll… I don’t think so.
just doun’t.
no
no
on
No!
-_- My brain hurts trying to figure out what he said
Exactly!
2 Likes
why “exactly?”
Goes on the GNU site for more information
@solal2003, you want this game to be free software. Why are you even using Wikipedia as example then? And yes, explain to me why this should be free software as your first post doesn’t explain that at all. 
read my posts : Goes on the GNU site for more information
I do not just use Wikipedia as an example, this is just the first that comes into my head
@solal2003, another thing. Without restriction? The devs wouldn’t have anything to say about pirating in that case. For a indie developer like Greenheart Games that would be a nightmare. You’re just trying to make the game bad with this and making it free software would therefore be very bad for the devs. Also, I’ve read your post. They make very little sense.
1 Like
This is what makes the strength of free software: everyone can be paid for their amendments, and if ever one contributor put too high a price, you can contribute to buy the software and install copies on all those who participated in the purchase.
Also, https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy
No, that statement is completely incorrect
1 Like
Free in the sense of freedom!!!
Look at other games such as BF and CoD.
These games give you no freedom and don’t even have mod support
Your theory is invalid
It’s just that these games are tools used by developers to do a lot of shameful things https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/proprietary.html
But what you are saying is it MUST be free
The developers don’t want that
All i’m saying is, respect the developers choices